^ (n a v i g a t e) ^
6:44 p.m., 2001-09-13
"now i'd like to address those that say the people who were hurt in nyc and the pentagon were not innocent. that they passively supported horrible acts that our government has had a hand in. by saying that, you're also saying that the innocent people our government has been responsible for killing were also not innocent because they passively went along with whatever their government did. hence there are no innocent people. hence your point is null"or maybe i was pointing out at fatal flaw that government and religions plant in their constituency that compels them to blindly accept and defend what their leaders do as "right". i see my point as reinforced. killing or bullying with the intent of pushing one's views upon innocent and/or uninvolved is wrong. duh. comparing what happened here this week to what i pointed out about the regimes of asia and south america flaws your point my dear. a hostile government with no regard or concern for the inhabitants of their territory who do not accept the forced form of government have no relationship to what happened here. people who are victimized by our political interests are seldom involved in the choices made by their "leaders" who are more like captors.
my point stands for what it is, as much as you may have misunderstood it.
